Football is boring, isn’t it? Especially the boring parts of football, like rule changes and minor gripes.
The discourse around VAR has taken boring football chat to a
new level, so it’s time that I add to it, just a little.
VAR will settle. It’ll take a while, like video reviews took
time with rugby and cricket, but it will, broadly speaking, settle. I’m not
zealous about VAR - until about 2012, I was probably anti-it for all the
reasons people are anti-it now, but I think it will greatly reduce injustices,
it will reduce cheating and it will reduce serious injuries and bad fouls, and those
are prices worth paying.
I feel they’ve steadily messed up the roll-out, of course,
but so be it. They should have taken it as an opportunity to be more liberal on
laws, as VAR would redress that liberality, but instead they seem to have gone more
strict.
I’ll give an example of what I mean, relating to handball,
which has been a funny old rule for a long time.
I was thinking about the only time, while I was playing
football, I gave away a penalty for handball. It was in 2002, so a long time
ago, when football was football, handball was handball and everything was
apparently simple.
There was a low, not especially fast, ball into the box,
which just grazed off someone’s side about five yards in front of me, bounced up
and then hit me on the hand, which I’d, slightly dopily, failed to get out of
the way of the ball’s new trajectory.
A penalty was given. No one complained. I didn’t, nor my
team mates. It was a clear penalty based on the kind of things that were given
as penalties. And yet, it was in no way deliberate. My hand was just there when
the ball went in a slightly unexpected direction and I was not sharp enough to
make sure it wasn’t.
Deliberate handballs, actual deliberate handballs, are rare
in football, always have been. They do happen, but not that often. Somewhere
along the line, and not just in the last few years, “deliberate” came to mean “not
doing everything you possibly and conceivably can to make sure the ball doesn’t
hit your hand”.
That’s slightly understandable, as, without VAR, players
could slyly do deliberate handballs which didn’t look deliberate if there was
too lenient an interpretation of “deliberate”, so it was reasonable to be
strict and say anything that looked like it might, in any way, have been
intentional, shall count as intentional.
But, now, with VAR, and the possibility of being able to
tell much more clearly what is actually meant, it is surely an opportunity to
liberalise the handball law again, so that defenders aren’t terrified, strikers
don’t kick the ball at hands, and checkers can check, with a higher degree of
certain than has ever been possible, if a defender makes a deliberate,
conscious, movement towards the ball, or there hand just happened to be in the
wrong place at the wrong time.
Interesting! Not boring.
ReplyDeleteBut I wonder if VAR would actually have this impact. My understadning from the world of law/psychology is that, when juries watch videos of suspects, especially in slow motion, they are far more likely to assume that any given action was, in fact, deliberate rather than accidental...