My favourite cricketer has announced his retirement. Or at least, he was my favourite cricketer for quite a while – probably from about 2009 to 2017 or so. I first saw Ian Bell play when he was about 10, on a tour to the Midlands when he played for a team called Kenilworth Wardens, and followed his career closely all the way. His first test match was in 2004, his last in 2015.
He never quite convinced some people – throughout
his career he was accused of mental fragility, of being a fairweather player, a
supporting player, not being dominant enough … for those who like their sports
stars puffing their chest out and staring the opposition down, his quiet manner
and timidity were anathema. He was often the one people were calling to be
dropped, and even when he was scoring centuries, there’d be suggestions that
these were cheap runs, or questions as to why he didn’t do this more often.
Of course, some of us warm to that fragility,
real or imagined. Bell’s test career had peaks and troughs – it ended with a
disappointing decline which means that, on statistics alone, he won’t quite be
seen as a great of the highest order. Yet, it’s good enough. He made 22 test
centuries, more than the likes of David Gower, Graeme Gooch, Len Hutton.
Some will say, with his exquisitely elegant technique, with
how good he was when he was at his best, it’s a shame it couldn’t be 10,000
test runs at an average of 47, not 7,700 at 43. But there are so many
constituent parts that make up a test batsman, and the established narratives
don’t tell the whole story. A decent comparison for Bell is Amir Khan – he was
both mentally tougher and technically more flawed than is the general
impression.
People dwell on the weakness, but, in the end,
there is far more triumph than failure. He came back from knocks and doubts,
better than ever, more than once. He, famously, scored 3 centuries in a series
against one of the best Australian attacks going, in the 2013 Ashes.
One thing I noticed, in a TV interview he gave
yesterday, the supposedly timid eyes were noticeably steely. I suspect he’s one
of those guys people never saw as “leadership material” but who will make an
excellent coach.
I recently watched a documentary, ‘The Edge’,
about the rise and fall of the Strauss-era England side. It was good, but
focused a bit too much for my liking on the obvious tales, the ones that had
made the news, and had less from the quieter, less ostentatious guys like Bell.
He remains, in that sense, pretty unknowable, but hopefully will achieve the
full acclaim now he rarely received during his career.
No comments:
Post a Comment